Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2018)

A Syntactic Analysis of Relative Clauses in the Southern Cushitic Language, Iraqw

https://doi.org/10.56279/jhss.v7i2.24
Chrispina Alphonce

Corresponding Author(s) : Chrispina Alphonce

chrisalpho333@gmail.com

Journal of Humanities & Social Science (JHSS), Vol. 7 No. 2 (2018)

Abstract

The article offers an account of the syntax of relative clauses in Iraqw, a Southern Cushitic language of the Afroasiatic Micropylum spoken in northern Tanzania. It examines the structure of relative clauses, relativization strategies, relative markers and noun phrase accessibility hierarchy (AB). Using the descriptive research design, coupled with the qualitative approach, data were generated through elicitation. 8 informants were sampled through snowball technique to inform the study. Text collection was also done to identify relative clauses. The analysis of the data obtained revealed the following: (i) Iraqw displays postnominal relative clause, the feature that is common in most of the world and African languages; (ii) Iraqw speakers typically use overt morphological relative markers, namely demonstrative suffixes (-i?/-ka??,-si?ng, -qa??1 and -da??), and independent construct cases (oo, ar and awa) and covert phonological marker, the construct suffix (marked into the head noun by high tone); (iii) the language uses the gap strategy for relativization of nearly all grammatical relations, except the object of comparison, which uses resumptive pronoun; (iv) the direct object of ditransitive verbs uses both gapping strategy and resumptive pronoun; (v) Iraqw can relativize all six grammatical relations on the accessibility hierarchy, although the object of comparison is hardly relativizable.

Keywords

Iraqw, Southern Cushitic postnominal relative clause relativizer accessibility hierarchy
A Syntactic Analysis of Relative Clauses in the Southern Cushitic Language, Iraqw. (2018). Journal of Humanities & Social Science (JHSS), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.56279/jhss.v7i2.24
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Andrews, A. D. 2007. Relative Clauses. In T. Schopen (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description; Volume II: Complex Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–236.
  2. Baye, Y. 1987. Relative Clauses in Oromo. Journal of Ethiopian Studies, 20: 60–74.
  3. Bendjaballah, S. & P. C. Hofherr, 2001. Modification of the Noun in Somali: Comparative Evidence from other Cushitic Languages. Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 27(1): 27–38.
  4. Caron, B. 2015. Hausa Grammatical Sketch. In A. Mettouchi, M. Vanhove & D. Caubet (eds.). The CorpAfroAs Corpus. ANR CorpAfroAs: A Corpus for Afro-Asiatic Languages, [http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00647533].
  5. Cinque, G. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its Exceptions, Linguistic Inquiry, 36: 315 – 332.
  6. Comrie, B. 2003. Typology and Language Acquisition: The Case of Relative Clauses. In A. Ramat (ed.). Typology of Second Language Acquisition. Berlin de Grutyer, pp. 19–37.
  7. Comrie, B. & T. Kuteva. 2005. Relativization Strategies. In M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil & B. Comrie (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 494–497.
  8. Crysmann, B. & C. H. Reintges. 2014. The Polyfunctionality of Coptic Egyptian Relative Complementisers. In S. Muller (ed.). Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University at Buffalo. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
  9. de Vries, M. 2002. Patterns of Relative Clauses, Linguistics in Netherlands, 18: 231–243.
  10. Dryer, M. 2005. Order of Relative Clause and Noun. In M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil & B. Comrie (eds.). The Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 366–369.
  11. Hamdallah, R. W. & H. Y. Tushyeh. 1998. A Contrastive Analysis of English and Arabic in Relativization. Paper and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, 34: 141–152. School of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.
  12. Hayward, D. 1984. The Arbore Language: A First Investigation (Including a Vocabulary). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
  13. Hiraiwa, K. 2003. Relativization in Buli. In G. Akanlig-Pare & M. Kenstowicz (eds.), Studies in Buli Grammar (MIT working papers on endangered and less familiar languages, Vol. 4), 45–84. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
  14. —. 2009. The head-internal relativization parameter in Gur: D and EPP. In A. Schardl, M. Walkow & M. Abdurrahman (eds.), The proceedings of the NELS 38, 297–310. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
  15. Keenan, E. 1985. Relative Clauses. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Keenan, E. & B. Comrie.1977. Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1): 63–99.
  17. Kiesling, R. 2000. Some Salient Features of Southern Cushitic (Common West Rift). Lingua Posnaniensia, 42: 69–89.
  18. Klein, T. 2014. Deriving a Typology of Resumption. In A. Assmann, S. Bank, D. Georgi, T. Klein, P. Weisser & E. Zimmermann (eds.). Topics at INFL, Universit?at Leipzig, pp 329–346.
  19. Kroeger, P. 2004. Analysing Syntax: A Lexical-Functional Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Language of Tanzania Project (LOT). 2009. Atlas ya Lugha za Tanzania. Dar es Salaam: University of Dar es Salaam.
  21. Mous, M. 1993. A Grammar of Iraqw. Hamburg: Buske.
  22. Nordbustad, F. 1985. Iraqw Grammar: An Analytical Study of the Iraqw. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
  23. Owens, J. 1985. A Grammar of Harar Oromo (Northeastern Ethiopia) Including a Text and a Glossary. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
  24. Payne, T. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Rawda, S. 2003. Relativization in Silt’e. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University Doctoral Dissertation.
  26. Savà, G. 2005. A Grammar of Ts’amakko. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
  27. Schiattarella, V. 2014. Relativization in Siwi (Berber). In A. Belkadi, K. Chatsiou and K. Rowan (eds.). Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 4. London: SOAS.
  28. Schneider-Blume, G. 2007. A Grammar of Alaaba. A Highland East Cushitic language of Ethiopia. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
  29. Skaf, R. 2009. Relativization in Aramaic-Syriac. Coyote Papers-Proceedings of the Arizona Linguistic Circle 3: The University of Arizona.
  30. Tosco, M. 2003. Cushitic and Omotic Overview. In L. Bender, D. Appleyard, & G. Takács (eds.). Afrasian: Selected Comparative/Historical Papers In Memory of Igor M. Diakonoff. München: Lincom Europa, pp. 87–92.
  31. Treis, Y. 2008. Relativization in Kambaata (Cushitic). In Z. Frajzyngier & E. Shay (eds.). Interaction of Morphology and Syntax: Case Studies in Afroasiatic, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 161–206.
  32. Wu, T. 2012. Prenominal Relative Clauses in Ethiopian Languages: From Inside and from Outside. Studies in African Linguistics, 41 (2): 214–253.
  33. Zeller, J. 2015. The Syntax of African Languages: University of Kwa Zulu-Natal.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.

How to Cite

A Syntactic Analysis of Relative Clauses in the Southern Cushitic Language, Iraqw. (2018). Journal of Humanities & Social Science (JHSS), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.56279/jhss.v7i2.24
Download

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.