Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2021): Special Issue Gender II

A Portrait of the Gender Gap in STEM: A Focus on Identity Formation Among Final-year Undergraduate Students in Tanzania

https://doi.org/10.56279/jhss.v10i3.86
mjege kinyota,

Corresponding Author(s) : mjege kinyota,

mjege.kinyota@duce.ac.tz

Journal of Humanities & Social Science (JHSS), Vol. 10 No. 3 (2021): Special Issue Gender II

Abstract

This study investigates whether male and female students differ with respect to their
STEM identity, and how female students negotiate between being female and being
students pursuing careers that are perceived as masculine. The study uses a sequential
explanatory mixed method design. A total of 749 final year STEM students from three
Tanzanian universities participated in a survey that investigated STEM identity using six
sub-scales: identity prominence, gender identity, stereotype endorsement, self-efficacy,
persistence intentions, and positive feedback. Also, 19 females were interviewed as a
follow-up exploration. Findings indicated a significant difference on stereotype
endorsement only, where males significantly held negative stereotypes about females’
abilities to succeed in STEM. However, there were a few variations across universities
and specific STEM programmes. Qualitatively, the findings indicated that as a result of
social and cultural constructions, meanings associated with some STEM careers such as
engineering were in conflict with meanings associated with being a woman.
Consequently, females in STEM must find a negotiating space by balancing the two
conflicting identities. Interestingly, females used different strategies such as deliberate
efforts to outperform males in examinations as a means to resist male domination in
STEM. Finally, the implications for policy and future research are discussed.

Keywords

gender, negative gender stereotypes, STEM identity, underrepresentation.
A Portrait of the Gender Gap in STEM: A Focus on Identity Formation Among Final-year Undergraduate Students in Tanzania. (2021). Journal of Humanities & Social Science (JHSS), 10(3). https://doi.org/10.56279/jhss.v10i3.86
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Ahlqvist, S., B. London & L. Rosenthal. 2013. Unstable Identity Compatibility: How Gender Rejection
  2. Sensitivity Undermines the Success of Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, And
  3. Mathematics Fields. Psychological Science, 24(9): 1644–1652.
  4. Bipa, S. D. 2010. Participation of women in science education trends and issues in higher education in
  5. Tanzania. An unpublished master’s thesis. University of Oslo.
  6. Bisin, A., E. Patacchini, T. Verdier & Y. Zenou. 2011. Formation and Persistence of Oppositional
  7. Identities. European Economic Review, 55(8): 1046–1071.
  8. Burke, P. J. 2015. Reducing Gender Equity to a Battle of the Sexes is Simplistic, Crude and
  9. Dangerous, pp. 14–15.
  10. Cadaret, M. C., P. J. Hartung., L. M. Subich., & I. K. Weigold. 2017. Stereotype threat as a barrier to
  11. women entering engineering careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99: 40–51.
  12. Carli, L. L., L. Alawa, Y. Lee, B. Zhao & E. Kim. 2016. Stereotypes About Gender and Science: Women
  13. ? Scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2): 244–260.
  14. Carter, M. J. 2013. Advancing Identity Theory: Examining The Relationship Between Activated
  15. Identities and Behaviour in Different Social Contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76(3): 203-223.
  16. Chuwa, J. M. 2014. Determinants of Mathematics and Science Career Choices among Secondary School
  17. Female Students in Ilala District, Dar Es Salaam Region. A Masters dissertation submitted to The
  18. Open University of Tanzania.
  19. Contini, D., M. L. D. Tommaso & S. Mendolia. 2017. The Gender Gap in Mathematics Achievement:
  20. Evidence from Italian Data. Economics of Education Review, 58: 32–42.
  21. Creswell, J. 2014. Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.).
  22. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  23. Dasgupta, N. & J. G. Stout. 2014. Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, And
  24. Mathematics: STEMing The Tide and Broadening Participation in STEM Careers. Policy Insights
  25. from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1): 21–29.
  26. Dickerson, A., S. Mcintosh & C. Valente. 2015. Do the Maths: An Analysis of the Gender Gap in
  27. Mathematics in Africa. Economics of Education Review, 46: 1–22.
  28. Diekman, A. B., M. Steinberg, E. R. Brown, A.L. Belanger & E. K. Clark. 2017. A Goal Congruity Model
  29. of Role Entry, Engagement, And Exit: Understanding Communal Goal Processes in STEM Gender
  30. Gaps. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(2): 142
  31. Duffin, L. C., B. F. French & H. Patrick. 2012. The Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale: Confirming the factor
  32. structure with beginning pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6): 827–834.
  33. Etzkowitz, H. 2008. Removing Barriers: Women in Academic Science, Technology, Engineering, and
  34. Mathematics. Contemporary Sociology, 37(1): 24–25.
  35. Francis, B. 2000. The Gendered Subjects: Students’ Subject Preferences and Discussions of Gender
  36. and Subject Abilities. Oxford Review of Education, 26(1): 35–48.
  37. Francis, B., L. Archer, J. Moote, J. Dewitt, E. Macleod & L. Yeomans. 2017. The Construction of
  38. Physics As a Quintessentially Masculine Subject: Young People’s Perceptions of Gender issues
  39. in Access to Physics. Sex Roles, 76: 156–174. Ibrahim, F. & J. Heuer. 2016. Cultural Identity: Components and Assessment. In F. Ibrahim & J. Heuer
  40. (Eds.), Cultural and Social Justice Counselling (pp. 15–50). Switzerland: Springer International
  41. Publishing.
  42. Jones, B. D., C. Ruff & M. C. Paretti. 2013. The Impact of Engineering Identification and Stereotypes
  43. on Undergraduate Women’s Achievement and Persistence in Engineering. Social Psychology of
  44. Education, 16: 471–493.
  45. Kabote, S.J., E. Niboye & C. I. Nombo. 2014. Performance in Mathematics and Science Subjects: A
  46. Gender Perspective for Selected Primary Schools in Rural and Urban Tanzania. International
  47. Journal of Gender and Women’s Studies, 2(3): 87–105.
  48. Kasembe, M. K. & S. Mashauri. 2011. Assessment of Women Scientists’ Participation in Science,
  49. Engineering and Technological Industries (Set) In Tanzania. UNESCO/Government of Tanzania.
  50. Kellner, D., & J. Share. 2007. Critical media literacy is not an option. Learning Inquiry, 1(1): 59–69.
  51. Legewie, J. & T. A. DiPrete. 2014. The High School Environment and The Gender Gap in Science and
  52. Engineering. Sociology of Education, 87(4): 259–280.
  53. Lihamba, A., R. Mwaipopo &L. Shule. 2006. The Challenges of Affirmative Action in Tanzanian
  54. Higher Education Institutions: A Case Study of the University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  55. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29: 581–591.
  56. Lile, J. 2013. Toward A Structural Understanding of Identity Formation: A Review and Extension of
  57. Theory. An International Journal of Theory and Research, 13(4): 318–347.
  58. Makhubela, M. S. 2015. Ego-Identity Formation in Black South African Young Adults. Journal of
  59. Psychology in Africa, 25(1): 83–85.
  60. McLennan, B., P. McIlveen & H. N. Perera. 2017. Pre-Service Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Mediates the
  61. Relationship Between Career Adaptability and Career Optimism. Teaching and Teacher Education,
  62. : 176–185.
  63. Mishkin, H., N. Wangrowicz, D. Dori & Y. Judy. 2016. Career Choice of Undergraduate Engineering
  64. Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228: 222–228.
  65. Muijs, D. 2004. Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
  66. Phipps, A. 2007. Re-inscribing Gender Binaries: Deconstructing the Dominant Discourse Around
  67. Women’s Equality in Science, Engineering, And Technology. Sociological Review, 55(4): 768–787.
  68. Sassler, S., J. Glass, Y. Levitte & K. M. Michelmore. 2016. The Missing Women in STEM? Assessing
  69. Gender Differentials in the Factors Associated with Transition to First Jobs. Social Science
  70. Research, 63: 192–208.
  71. Settles, I. H., R. C. O’Connor & S. C. Y. Yap. 2016. Climate Perceptions and Identity Interference
  72. Among Undergraduate Women in STEM: The Protective Role of Gender Identity. Psychology of
  73. Women Quarterly, 40(4): 488–503. *
  74. Simon, R. M., A. Wagner & B. Killion. 2017. Gender And Choosing A STEM Major In College:
  75. Femininity, Masculinity, Chilly Climate, And Occupational Values. Journal of Research in Science
  76. Teaching, 54(3): 299–323.
  77. Siwatu, K. O., S. M. Putman, T. V. Starker-Glass & C. W. Lewis. 2017. The Culturally Responsive
  78. Classroom Management Self-Efficacy Scale: Development and Initial Validation. Urban Education,
  79. (7): 862–888.
  80. Smetackova, I. 2015. Gender Stereotypes, Performance and Identification with Math. Procedia -
  81. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190: 211–219.
  82. Stets, J. E., P. S. Brenner, P. J. Burke & R. T. Serpe. 2017. The Science Identity and Entering a Science
  83. Occupation. Social Science Research, 64(1): 1–14.
  84. Stets, J. E & P. J. Burke. 2000. Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly,
  85. (3): 224–237.
  86. Stout, J. G., V. A. Grunberg & T. A. Ito. 2016. Gender Roles and Stereotypes About Science Careers
  87. Help Explain Women and Men’s Science Pursuits. Sex Roles, 75, 490–499.
  88. Strauss, A. L., & J. M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and
  89. Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  90. Toyoki, S. & A. D. Brown. 2014. Stigma, Identity and Power: Managing Stigmatized Identities
  91. Through Discourse. Human Relations, 67(6): 715–737.
  92. Wang, K. & J. F. Dovidio. 2017. Perceiving and Confronting Sexism: The Causal Role of Gender
  93. Identity Salience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(1): 65–76.
  94. Wang, M. & J. Degol. 2013. Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy –
  95. Value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields.
  96. Developmental Review, 33(4): 304–340.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.

How to Cite

A Portrait of the Gender Gap in STEM: A Focus on Identity Formation Among Final-year Undergraduate Students in Tanzania. (2021). Journal of Humanities & Social Science (JHSS), 10(3). https://doi.org/10.56279/jhss.v10i3.86
Download

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.